So you're shopping for an AI humanizer. Smart move.
But which one actually works?
We built Refineo, so our opinion is biased. But we also know this space inside and out. This comparison gives you our candid assessment of how Refineo stacks up against Undetectable AI and QuillBot.
We took the same five text samples, put them through each tool, ran the results through three major AI detectors, and graded meaning preservation on a five-point scale.
Spoiler: none are perfect. Each has trade-offs. The right choice depends on what you need.
TL;DR — Quick Comparison
| Feature | Refineo | Undetectable AI | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Humanization | Detection bypass | Paraphrasing |
| Detection Bypass | Good | Excellent | Inconsistent |
| Meaning Preservation | Excellent | Fair | Good |
| Price (Monthly) | $19.99-$49.99 | $9.99-$49.99 | $9.99 |
| Free Tier | 3 requests/month | Trial only | Generous |
| Processing Speed | Fast (under 5s) | Medium | Fast |
Testing Methodology
To keep this comparison fair, we tested each tool using:
Text Samples (5 total):
- Blog post intro (200 words)
- Marketing email (150 words)
- Product description (100 words)
- LinkedIn post (180 words)
- Academic paragraph (220 words)
AI Detectors:
- GPTZero
- Originality.ai
- Copyleaks
Scoring:
- Detection results: % flagged as AI
- Meaning preservation: 1-5 scale (5 = identical meaning)
All samples were generated with ChatGPT-4 and tested on the same day.
Refineo — Detailed Review
Refineo breaks AI patterns while preserving your original meaning. The output reads naturally without wandering too far from what you actually wrote.
Strengths
- Excellent meaning preservation — Your ideas stay intact
- Fast processing — Results in under 5 seconds
- Clean interface — No confusing modes or options
- Free tier — Test before committing money
Weaknesses
- Newer brand — Less market recognition than established players
- Single mode — No "aggressive" vs "light" humanization options
Best For
Writers, content marketers, and anyone who values accuracy over maximum detector evasion. Refineo does one thing and does it well.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Requests | Word Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 3/month | 500 words |
| Basic | $19.99/mo | 80/month | 1,500 words |
| Pro | $29.99/mo | 150/month | 3,000 words |
| Ultra | $49.99/mo | 300/month | 5,000 words |
Undetectable AI — Detailed Review
Undetectable AI specializes in bypassing AI detectors. Multiple modes like "more readable" and "more human" let you tune the output.
Strengths
- Strong bypass rates — Performs well against most detectors
- Multiple modes — Customize for different use cases
- Established brand — Proven track record
Weaknesses
- Aggressive rewriting — Sometimes changes meaning significantly
- Pricing adds up — Heavy users pay more
- No free tier — Must pay to properly test
Best For
Users who prioritize detector bypass over preserving exact phrasing. If passing Originality.ai matters more than keeping every nuance of your text, this tool delivers.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Words |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly | $9.99+ | 10,000+ |
| Business | Custom | Unlimited |
Note: Pricing varies based on word volume.
QuillBot — Detailed Review
QuillBot is a paraphrasing tool, not a dedicated AI humanizer. People use it for humanization because changing sentence structure sometimes helps with detection—but that's a side effect, not the design goal.
Strengths
- Lowest price — Most affordable option
- Useful free tier — Test extensively before paying
- Bonus tools — Grammar checker, summarizer included
- Good paraphrasing — Excellent for rewording content
Weaknesses
- Inconsistent detection bypass — Not designed for this
- Mechanical output — Can feel paraphrased rather than humanized
- Awkward phrasing — Some modes produce strange results
Best For
General paraphrasing needs where AI detection isn't the priority. If budget matters most and detection bypass is secondary, QuillBot works.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 125 words, basic modes |
| Premium | $9.99/mo | Unlimited, all modes |
Detection Test Results
Here's how each tool performed against major AI detectors. Lower percentages = better (less AI detected).
GPTZero Results
| Sample Type | Original | Refineo | Undetectable AI | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog intro | 98% AI | 12% AI | 8% AI | 45% AI |
| Marketing email | 95% AI | 15% AI | 5% AI | 52% AI |
| Product description | 92% AI | 18% AI | 10% AI | 38% AI |
| LinkedIn post | 97% AI | 14% AI | 7% AI | 48% AI |
| Academic paragraph | 99% AI | 22% AI | 12% AI | 55% AI |
Originality.ai Results
| Sample Type | Original | Refineo | Undetectable AI | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog intro | 100% AI | 18% AI | 5% AI | 62% AI |
| Marketing email | 98% AI | 22% AI | 8% AI | 58% AI |
| Product description | 95% AI | 15% AI | 6% AI | 48% AI |
| LinkedIn post | 99% AI | 20% AI | 4% AI | 55% AI |
| Academic paragraph | 100% AI | 28% AI | 10% AI | 68% AI |
Copyleaks Results
| Sample Type | Original | Refineo | Undetectable AI | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog intro | AI Detected | Human | Human | AI Detected |
| Marketing email | AI Detected | Human | Human | Mixed |
| Product description | AI Detected | Human | Human | Human |
| LinkedIn post | AI Detected | Human | Human | AI Detected |
| Academic paragraph | AI Detected | Mixed | Human | AI Detected |
Meaning Preservation Test
Detection bypass means nothing if your content doesn't say what you meant. Here's how each tool preserved the original meaning (5 = perfect preservation):
| Sample Type | Refineo | Undetectable AI | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blog intro | 4.8 | 3.5 | 4.2 |
| Marketing email | 4.7 | 3.2 | 4.0 |
| Product description | 4.9 | 3.8 | 4.3 |
| LinkedIn post | 4.6 | 3.4 | 4.1 |
| Academic paragraph | 4.5 | 3.0 | 3.8 |
| Average | 4.7 | 3.4 | 4.1 |
Example: Blog Intro
Original (ChatGPT):
"In today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, content marketing has emerged as a cornerstone of successful business strategies. Organizations must adapt their approaches to remain competitive."
Refineo output:
"Content marketing isn't optional anymore—it's how businesses stay relevant. The landscape keeps shifting, and your strategy needs to shift with it."
Undetectable AI output:
"Modern commerce demands fresh thinking about promotion and audience engagement. Companies that fail to innovate their messaging approaches risk falling behind nimbler competitors in crowded markets."
QuillBot output:
"In the current rapidly changing digital environment, content marketing has become a fundamental element of effective business strategies. Companies need to modify their methods to stay competitive."
Refineo kept the core message tight. Undetectable AI rewrote it entirely—different words, different emphasis. QuillBot shuffled words around but kept the robotic structure.
Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Refineo if:
- Meaning preservation matters most
- You want fast, simple processing
- You're testing the waters (free tier)
- You write marketing content, blogs, or business communications
Choose Undetectable AI if:
- Maximum detector bypass is your priority
- You don't mind significant rewrites
- You're willing to pay from day one
- Academic or high-stakes detection scenarios
Choose QuillBot if:
- Budget is your primary constraint
- AI detection isn't your main concern
- You need general paraphrasing features
- You want bundled tools (grammar, summarizer)
The Honest Take
We built Refineo, so take our opinion with that context.
But here's the truth: Undetectable AI beats more detectors. If that's all that matters, use it. QuillBot costs less. If budget is everything, use that.
Refineo's advantage is balance. Your text sounds human and still sounds like you wrote it. For most use cases—content marketing, business writing, everyday content—that balance matters more than maximizing any single metric.
The best way to decide? Try them.
Test Refineo free — Humanize your first text with no signup required.
Last updated: January 2026